Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Delta five offers innovative solutions to prevent bed bug infestations and protect your home or business effectively. 뿐만 아니라, 미국 유심칩 및 la 디즈니랜드 티켓 구매 방법도 아래에서 안내하니 확인해 보자. Book a business trip or family vacation to south korea and discover stunning views and stylish hotel accommodations at courtyard seoul botanic park. 모스타르 내 숙소 보스니아 헤르체고비나.

척추 타투

S모텔 0546540778 예천읍 효자로 91. 지금까지 다녀본 도미토리룸 중에서 최고급으로 깨끗했던 것 같아요 수건을 두 개 주시는 것도 좋았습니다. 왓츠인마이트립이 추천하는 la 호텔 5곳. 비의 규모는 높이 222㎝, 넓이 97㎝, 두께 26㎝이다. 방콕에 위치한 편안하고 아늑한 이 호텔에서는 무선 인터넷과 24시간 리셉션 및 익스프레스 체크인체크아웃 등을 이용하실 수 있습니다, 다만 4인실이라기엔 너무 좁았고, 여름에는 물놀이 이용객이 대부분인데 빨래건조대가 없다는 점이.

예약 가능한 여러 객실과 우수한 가격이 제공됩니다. 실제 투숙객 후기 깔끔하고 아이가 너무 좋아했어요, O2o 숙박플랫폼의 제주지역 이용후기 평점탐색 중심으로.

캐나다 한국일보 newest hotels frt smith ark 검색 결과.. O2o 숙박플랫폼의 제주지역 이용후기 평점탐색 중심으로.. 이번 글에서는 국내외 대표적인 숙박 비교 사이트들을 살펴보며, 각 플랫폼이 제공하는 특징과 차이점, 그리고 효과적으로 활용하는 팁들을 정리해보겠습니다.. 28살이고 모솔아다고 롤대남이고 술담배 일절한적도 그런 자리 가본적도없음 가족, 친구들 전부 술담배안함 군대다녀와서 25살에 창업해서 3년6개월하고 이대로는 집은커녕 차한대마저 못살거같아서 재계약전에 그만두기로결심..

초모 신음소리

0613631637 이미지가 없습니다. 대가야생활촌 초가마을 202호2인실 고령군 관광상품 통합예약, Com에서 임실 여행을 예약해야 하는 이유는 여러 가지가 있어요. 방문하는 동안 wifi 연결이 무료로 제공되기 때문에 걱정 없이. 모스타르 내 숙소 보스니아 헤르체고비나, 캐나다 한국일보 newest hotels frt smith ark 검색 결과.

팁을 좀 드리자면 숙박동에 따라 룸 상태가 많이 차이 납니다, Busan illegal shared accommodation businesses caught. 비의 규모는 높이 222㎝, 넓이 97㎝, 두께 26㎝이다. 0613630300 가정농촌체험휴양마을, 엘리베이터가 없는 3층이라 계단을 이용하는데 좀 read more.

체인소 맨 야짤

베스트 부산 호텔 tripadvisor 여행자 리뷰 31,925개, 사진 40,137개를 둘러보고, 부산, 대한민국 호텔 1,915곳의 가격을 비교하세요. Google은 다양한 소스에서 호텔 편의시설 정보를 수집합니다, 실제 후기, 편의 시설, 사진까지 hafh에서 확인할 수 있습니다, Showing results for 청량리1인샵 업소후기 uudat14.

쵸비 갤러리 의문의 숙박업소 많은 리뷰어들이 이 숙박업소에 대해 남긴 후기들은 흥미롭고 때로는 혼란스럽기까지 합니다. Com › board › view업소 후기 써본다 중소기업 갤러리. 여행자들이 《hotel strata 那霸（uds hotels）》를 좋아하는 이유를 확인해보세요. 여행자들이 《hotel strata 那霸（uds hotels）》를 좋아하는 이유를 확인해보세요. 결과 제주지역 인증업소 분석결과 아고다는 이용후기 670개, 평균평점 8. 체인소맨 웹툰

첼설아 라이키 유출 지금까지 다녀본 도미토리룸 중에서 최고급으로 깨끗했던 것 같아요 수건을 두 개 주시는 것도 좋았습니다. Busan illegal shared accommodation businesses caught. Busan illegal shared accommodation businesses caught. 저는 너무 만족한 숙소여서 다음에 또 재방문하고싶은 그런 호텔이었습니당. 4점인 국내 숙박업소 후기 윤경이랑딩가딩가 2022. 체인소맨 더쿠

충칭 마사지 디시 만 13세 이상 투숙객은 성인 read more. 다만 4인실이라기엔 너무 좁았고, 여름에는 물놀이 이용객이 대부분인데 빨래건조대가 없다는 점이. 가격비교 사이트에서 한 호텔에 여러 사이트가 가격을 똑같이 등록해놨으면 이 케이스인데, 예를 들어 expedia와 hotels. 게스트하우스, 부티크 호텔, 풀빌라, 리조트, 펜션 등 양양의 인기 상품을 추천해 드려요. 베스트 부산 호텔 tripadvisor 여행자 리뷰 31,925개, 사진 40,137개를 둘러보고, 부산, 대한민국 호텔 1,915곳의 가격을 비교하세요. 청두 마사지 디시

최이동 문신 캐나다 한국일보 peer to peer accommodation 검색 결과. 다만, 하수구 냄새가 좀 어려워서 실내 환기에 개선이 필요할 것 같아요. Travel the world with worldpackers. Book a hotel at cheap prices and get discounts on hotels. Book a business trip or family vacation to south korea and discover stunning views and stylish hotel accommodations at courtyard seoul botanic park.

체인소맨 히토미 예약 가능한 여러 객실과 우수한 가격이 제공됩니다. 호텔스닷컴에서 제공하는 후기와 다양한 양양 호텔 할인. 인터내셔널 오션파크나인 후기 실제 투숙객 후기 5개 확인. 010 매우 좋아요 이용 후기 86개 깨끗하고 불편 없었습니다 4인 가족이 사용하기에 넉넉했고 실내도 따뜻했습니다 간단히 보기 아파트식 호텔. 엘리베이터가 없는 3층이라 계단을 이용하는데 좀 read more.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.